"Switch vendors to save money." The FTC says that advice cost small businesses more than it saved. Late in 2026, the agency filed a complaint against Riverside Payments and its co-founder Brandon Skinner. He promised owners 40 to 60 percent savings on card processing fees. His customers paid more, not less. The pitch was not the product. It was the trap.
The savings number on the quote sheet left out batch fees, activation fees, and charges for supposed data security failures. The real price lived in a 26-page contract most owners signed without reading past page three.
There Is a Name for This in the Literature
The economist Paul Klemperer published a study on switching costs that named a pattern he called "bargain-then-ripoff." The pattern is ordinary and, in his words, largely rational. A vendor sets a low entry price to capture a customer. Once switching costs lock that customer in, the real price rises. The bargain gets you in the door. The ripoff starts after you have moved your systems over.
The FTC's case against Riverside fits the pattern line by line. Skinner and his co-founder Jason Reese promised savings. The quote sheet showed a clean number. The 26-page contract buried the rest: fees that never appeared in the pitch, and a $695 early-termination charge for anyone who tried to leave.
Customers were told they could cancel anytime without penalty. The company even claimed it would switch unhappy businesses back to their old processor and pay them $500 for their "time and hassle." The contract said none of that was true.
The FTC imposed a judgment of more than $32 million. Riverside could not pay it. The agency collected $600,000. That gap tells you how much protection a legal win provides after the trap has already closed.
One Bad Company or a Pricing Pattern
This is not a story about one firm. In early 2025, the FTC sent more than 5,500 refund checks, totaling over $2.6 million, to businesses charged hidden or unauthorized fees by First American Payment Systems. Same industry. Same pattern. Different name on the door.
In 2025, the fintech firm Wise and the Centre for Economics and Business Research studied hidden fees across U.S. small businesses. The total: an estimated $153 billion in a single year. One in five of those businesses was pushed into the red as a direct result.
The savings pitch does not fail people. It fails the system they are trying to run.
The Flaw Is Structural
The problem is not that vendors lie about savings. Some do, but that is a character problem, not a system problem. The real flaw is that the savings pitch shows you entry price and hides exit price. Every decision based on entry price alone is a decision made with half the data.
Read the Exit Clause Before You Sign
The better principle is short: the real price of any vendor is the cost of leaving them. Once that is clear, three moves follow from it.
Move 1: Find the termination clause first
Do not start with the pricing page. Open the contract and search for the word "termination." Read every sentence around it. Look for the dollar amount, the notice period, and any auto-renewal language that resets the clock. If the contract runs 26 pages and the termination clause sits on page 22, that placement is not an accident.
This is the move that takes the most nerve. It means slowing down at the exact moment the sales rep wants you to speed up.
Move 2: Price the full switch, not the monthly rate
Add the cost of moving your current system to the new vendor. Add the staff hours to learn the new platform. Add the cost of your old vendor's exit fee if one exists. Then compare that total to the savings the new vendor promises over 12 months. If the switch cost eats most of the first year's savings, the "deal" is just a transfer from one line item to another.
Move 3: Ask for the fee schedule in a separate document
Any vendor who folds the full fee list into a long contract is using page count as a hiding place. Ask for a one-page sheet with every fee you will be charged, separate from the agreement. If they will not give it to you, that refusal is your answer.
What the System Shows You
Running these three checks on every vendor pitch for 90 days does something the savings advice never did:
You see which vendors price their exit clause to trap you and which price it to compete.
You see the gap between the quoted rate and the real monthly cost once every buried fee is added back.
You start to notice how often the savings number on a pitch deck fails to account for switching costs.
You build a filter that works on any vendor in any category, not just payment processors.
The Feedback Loop
At the end of 90 days, ask three things.
→ What moved the number on your actual monthly vendor costs?
→ What looked like a good deal but fell apart when you priced the full switch?
→ What friction showed up more than once across different vendor pitches?
That is the difference between advice that sounds right and a system that proves itself.
Your K-Cups Sat in a Warehouse for Months
Grocery store pods spend months going factory → warehouse → truck → shelf, losing the flavor oils that make coffee taste like coffee. Angelino's roasts, packs, and ships within days — 50+ flavors, compatible with Keurig®, from 39¢ a cup. New customers save 15%, no code needed.
Where You Stand
The pitch sounded clean. The exit clause told the truth. The real price of any vendor is not what they charge you to start. It is what they charge you to leave.
